Skip to the page

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra

Claude Opus 5.5 is the cheaper of the 2: for the same tokens, 3 read for each 1 written, GPT-6 Astra costs 2.5 times as much. Below are both price lists, what 8 everyday jobs cost a month on each, and how many tokens the same text takes on each, which can change the answer.

For the same tokens
Claude Opus 5.5 is cheaper; GPT-6 Astra costs 2.5 times as much
Cheaper to read
Claude Opus 5.5, $4 against $10
Cheaper to write
Claude Opus 5.5, $20 against $50
Scores higher
Neither, 167 and 166 are within the range of doubt
Larger window
GPT-6 Astra, 1.05M against 1M tokens

Price per million tokens, side by side

In US dollars, as each maker prints them. The better figure in each row is green.

Claude Opus 5.5AnthropicGPT-6 AstraOpenAI
InputTokens the model reads$4$10
Cached inputRead again from the cache$0.20$1
Cache writePutting text in the cache$5$12.50
OutputTokens it writes, thinking included$20$50
Blend 3:13 tokens read for each 1 written$8$20
Batch inputAnswers collected later$2$5
Batch output$10$25
Long prompt inputAbove 272K on GPT-6 Astra$4$20
Long prompt outputThe standard price where there is no long-prompt price$20$75
Context windowTokens it holds at once1M1.05M
Capability scoreEpoch Capabilities Index; GPT-5 is 150167166
Longest answerTokens it writes in 1 reply128K128K

The same text, counted by each maker

A price per token means little until you know how many tokens your text is. Here is our lesson How AI writes, about 1,700 words of English, counted the way each maker counts it, and what it costs to send it once.

  • Claude Opus 5.5

    about 2,100 to 3,600 tokens

    Sent once: 0.82 cents to 1.4 cents at $4 per million

    Anthropic does not publish its tokenizer. It says Claude 4.7 and later produce about 30 percent more tokens for the same text than earlier models, and an independent test counted TypeScript at 1.73 times OpenAI's figure. The range runs from OpenAI's count to 1.75 times it.

  • GPT-6 Astra

    about 2,100 tokens

    Sent once: 2.1 cents at $10 per million

    GPT-5.6 is counted with o200k_base, the tokenizer OpenAI publishes for it, so its count is exact. OpenAI has not published the tokenizer of GPT-6, so its count is the same o200k_base figure, marked as about.

What 8 everyday jobs cost a month on each

Each job at its usual number of runs a day, for 30 days, at the standard price. The cheaper of the 2 is green; open any job in the calculator to change it. Sizes are in tokens, and Claude Opus 5.5 can need up to 1.8 times as many as GPT-6 Astra for the same words, so its bill for the same work can be up to that much higher.

JobClaude Opus 5.5GPT-6 AstraDifference
A chat question300 in, 500 out, 100 a day$33.601.1 cents a run$84.002.8 cents a run2.5 times
A hard question, with thinking300 in, 1,400 out, 100 a day$87.602.9 cents a run$2197.3 cents a run2.5 times
A long report, summarised60,000 in, 2,000 out, 20 a day$16828 cents a run$42070 cents a run2.5 times
A 40-turn agent task2,800,000 in, 40,000 out, 10 a day$727$2.42 a run$2,196$7.32 a run3 times
A support bot's reply4,000 in, 300 out, 2,000 a day$8641.4 cents a run$2,2203.7 cents a run2.6 times
Sort a message into a category250 in, 5 out, 50,000 a day$1,6500.11 cents a run$4,1250.27 cents a run2.5 times
Read an invoice into fields1,500 in, 250 out, 1,000 a day$3301.1 cents a run$8252.8 cents a run2.5 times
Review a pull request25,000 in, 4,500 out, 50 a day$28519 cents a run$71348 cents a run2.5 times

Your own job on both

Start from a job, then set its size, how often it runs and whether the answers can wait. Both bills follow every change.

Start from a job

A short question and a few paragraphs back.

tokens

about 230 words

0%

Instructions or documents the model has read before cost far less the second time.

tokens

about 380 words

A month of this job

  • Claude Opus 5.5$33.60

    1.1 cents a run

  • GPT-6 Astra$84.00

    2.8 cents a run

Claude Opus 5.5 saves $50.40 a month; GPT-6 Astra costs 2.5 times as much.

This job on every model

Why the price per token is only the start

Every maker prints 2 main prices: one for the tokens a model reads (input) and one for the tokens it writes (output). On most current models writing costs 3 to 5 times as much as reading, so which model is cheaper can depend on the job. A job that reads a long document and writes a line pays mostly the input price; a chat that writes paragraphs pays mostly the output price. That is why each comparison prices 8 jobs and not one figure.

The same text is not the same number of tokens on every model. Each maker cuts text its own way, and Anthropic says its models from Claude 4.7 on produce about 30 percent more tokens for the same text than earlier ones. A model with the lower price per token can still send the larger bill, so each comparison counts one of our lessons the way both makers count it.

Discounts change the order too. Work that can wait costs half on a batch at the makers that offer one, and text read again from a cache costs a quarter of the input price or less on every current model here. The price table on each comparison shows who offers what.

Thinking is billed as output, and models differ in how much they think and how long they answer. A price list cannot show that. Before you switch, run the same 10 tasks on both models and compare the bills.

Questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 5.5 or GPT-6 Astra?
Claude Opus 5.5 is cheaper: $4 per million tokens read and $20 per million written, against $10 and $50 on GPT-6 Astra. On a mix of 3 tokens read for each 1 written, GPT-6 Astra costs 2.5 times as much.
Which is better, Claude Opus 5.5 or GPT-6 Astra?
They cannot be told apart on the Epoch Capabilities Index, an independent score from Epoch AI that combines over 50 benchmarks: Claude Opus 5.5 scores 167 and GPT-6 Astra 166, within the range of doubt around each (GPT-5 is 150). So choose on price and on 10 tasks of your own.
What does a support bot cost a month on Claude Opus 5.5 and GPT-6 Astra?
At 2,000 replies a day, each reading 4,000 tokens (50 percent of them from cache) and writing 300, it costs $864 a month on Claude Opus 5.5 and $2,220 on GPT-6 Astra: GPT-6 Astra costs 2.6 times as much for this job.
What does an AI agent task cost on Claude Opus 5.5 and GPT-6 Astra?
One 40-turn task that reads 2,800,000 tokens in all, 90 percent of them from cache, and writes 40,000, costs $2.42 on Claude Opus 5.5 and $7.32 on GPT-6 Astra. At 10 tasks a day that is $727 and $2,196 a month.
Which has the larger context window, Claude Opus 5.5 or GPT-6 Astra?
GPT-6 Astra, with 1.05M tokens against 1M on Claude Opus 5.5. The window holds your instructions, the files you attach, the conversation so far and the answer, all at once.
Does the same text take the same number of tokens on Claude Opus 5.5 and GPT-6 Astra?
No. Our lesson "How AI writes", 1,700 words long, is about 2,100 to 3,600 tokens on Claude Opus 5.5 and about 2,100 on GPT-6 Astra. Each maker cuts text its own way, and every extra token is paid for at the model's price.
Can I pay less on Claude Opus 5.5 and GPT-6 Astra for work that can wait?
Yes, on both. With a batch, where you collect the answers later instead of at once, Claude Opus 5.5 costs $2 per million tokens read and $10 written, and GPT-6 Astra $5 and $25.

Sources

Where each fact comes from

  1. 1Anthropic: API prices
  2. 2OpenAI: API prices
  3. 3How Anthropic models count tokens, source 1
  4. 4How Anthropic models count tokens, source 2
  5. 5How OpenAI models count tokens, source 1
  6. 6How OpenAI models count tokens, source 2
  7. 7Epoch Capabilities Index, by Epoch AI (CC BY 4.0)